HomeScorpionsVaejovidaeThe ProjectActivities/Products AcknowledgmentsLinks

FAMILY VAEJOVIDAEGenus ParavaejovisGenus ParuroctonusGenus PseudouroctonusGenus SerradigitusGenus SmeringerusGenus SyntropisGenus UroctonitesGenus UroctonusGenus Vaejovis

      eusthenura group
           Vaejovis bilineatus
           Vaejovis coahuilae
        Vaejovis confusus
       Vaejovis diazi diazi
      Vaejovis diazi transmontanus
       Vaejovis eusthenura
       Vaejovis flavus
      Vaejovis galbus
      Vaejovis glabrimanus
      Vaejovis globosus
       Vaejovis gravicaudus
        Vaejovis hoffmanni hoffmanni
       Vaejovis hoffmanni fuscus
      Vaejovis punctatus punctatus
       Vaejovis punctatus spadix
      Vaejovis punctatus variegatus
       Vaejovis puritanus
      Vaejovis spinigerus
       Vaejovis viscainensis
        Vaejovis vittatus
        Vaejovis waeringi
       Vaejovis waueri
      intrepidus group
        Vaejovis intrepidus intrepidus
        Vaejovis intrepidus atrox
        Vaejovis intrepidus cristimanus
      Vaejovis occidentalis
      Vaejovis subcristatus
      mexicanus group
        Vaejovis carolinianus
        Vaejovis cashi
        Vaejovis chamelaensis
      Vaejovis chiapas
       Vaejovis chisos
        Vaejovis deboersi
        Vaejovis dugesi
        Vaejovis feti
        Vaejovis franckei
       Vaejovis granulatus
      Vaejovis jonesi
       Vaejovis lapidicola
      Vaejovis maculosus
       Vaejovis mexicanus mexicanus
      Vaejovis mexicanus smithi
      Vaejovis monticola
      Vaejovis nigrofemoratus
        Vaejovis pattersoni
       Vaejovis paysonensis
      Vaejovis pusillus
       Vaevovis rosssmanni
      Vaejovis setosus
      Vaejovis sprousei
      Vaejovis tesselatus
      Vaejovis vaquero
        Vaejovis vorhiesi
      nitidulus group    
      Vaejovis curvidigitus
      Vaejovis davidi
      Vaejovis decipiens
      Vaejovis gracilis
      Vaejovis intermedius
      Vaejovis janssi
      Vaejovis kochi
      Vaejovis mauryi
      Vaejovis minckleyi
      Vaejovis mitchelli
      Vaejovis nigrescens
      Vaejovis nitidulus
      Vaejovis norteno
      Vaejovis peninsularis
      Vaejovis platnicki
      Vaejovis pococki
      Vaejovis rubrimanus
      Vaejovis solegladi
      punctipalpi group
      Vaejovis bruneus bruneus
      Vaejovis bruneus loretoensis
      Vaejovis bruneus villosus
      Vaejovis cazieri
      Vaejovis crassimanus
      Vaejovis hirsuticauda
      Vaejovis insularis
      Vaejovis magdalensis
      Vaejovis punctipalpi punctipalpi
      Vaejovis punctipalpi barbatus
      Vaejovis punctipalpi cerralvensis
      Vaejovis russelli
      Vaejovis sonorae
      incertae sedis
      Vaejovis acapulco
      Vaejovis cisnerosi
           Vaejovis kuarapu
      Vaejovis mumai
      Vaejovis nayarit
      Vaejovis pequeno
      Vaejovis spicatus
      Vaejovis zihuatanejensis
          "Vaejovis" flavescens

Genus Vejovoidus

Catalog of the VaejovidaeVaejovid  Bibliography

Why Study the Vaejovidae?

Vaejovis chisos Sissom 1990

Vaejovis chisos Sissom, 1990b: 48, 49-51, fig, 2A-G; Kovarík, 1998: 146; Sissom & Jackman, 1998: 151; Sissom, 2000:540; González Santillán & Sissom, 2004: 9; Jarvis et al. 2005: 207-211, figs. 1-4.

HOLOTYPE:  Vaejovis chisos Sissom: Holotype female from Kibbee (or Kibbe) Spring, Chisos Basin, Chisos Mountains (1,828 m), Big Bend National Park, Brewster Co., Texas, 31 Aug 1983 (W. D. and J. C. Sissom).  Deposited in the American Museum of Natural History, New York.

Original description:
Vaejovis chisos Sissom, 1990b: 48, 49-51, fig, 2A-G

Subsequent Accounts
Jarvis et al. 2005:

Description of Male. – Adult 27.35 mm in length.  Base coloration light yellow brown, with moderate fuscosity on dorsum, metasoma, pedipalps, and legs.
Prosoma:  Anterior carapacial margin emarginate; median notch weak, rounded; entire carapacial surface finely to coarsely granular.
Mesosoma:  Post-tergites densely coarsely granular.  Genital operculum completely divided, with genital papillae protruding posteromedially.  Pectinal tooth count 17-18.  Pectinal teeth large, each with elongate patch of peg sensilla.  Sternite VII with one pair of moderate, granular lateral carinae.  Stigmata suboval to elongate suboval. 
Metasoma:  Segments I-IV:  Dorsolateral carinae strong, serrate on I-III, crenulate on IV. Lateral supramedian carinae moderate to strong, crenulate.  Lateral inframedian carinae on I complete, granulose; on II incomplete, moderate, irregularly granular on posterior third; on III incomplete, weak on posterior third; on IV absent.  Ventrolateral carinae moderate, crenulate.  Ventral submedian carinae on I weak, smooth to finely granular; on II-IV, moderate, crenulate.  Dorsal intercarinal spaces with scattered coarse granulation.  Segment V:  Dorsolateral carinae moderate, serrate proximally; weak, granular distally.  Lateromedian carinae present on anterior three-fourths of segment, moderate, granular.  Ventrolateral and ventromedian carinae strong, serrate.  Intercarinal spaces finely granular.  Metasoma I-IV setal counts
:  dorsolaterals, 0/0:1/1:1/1:1/1; lateral supramedians, 0/0:1/1:1/1:2/2; lateral inframedians, 1/1:0/0:0/0:0/0; ventrolaterals, 2/2:2/2:2/3:3/3; ventral submedians, 3/3:3/3:3/3:4/4.  Ventral accessory setae lacking.  Metasomal segment V:  dorsolaterals, 3/3; lateromedians, 2/2; ventrolaterals, 4/4.  Metasomal segment I length/width = 0.92; III length/width = 1.18; V length/width = 2.38.
Telson:  Dorsal surface flattened, smooth; ventral surface with irregular fine granulation and weak punctations, about 16 pairs of large setae.
Hemispermatophore (Figs. 1-2):
 Moderately slender; distal lamina with a distal crest on dorsal surface and a single, blunt hook-like structure near the base.  Capsular area with simple invaginated sperm duct floor (Stockwell 1989: 130) and without conspicuous lobes or processes.  Sperm duct flanked along distal edge by a series of minute denticle-like structures.

Chelicerae:  Dentition typical of family (Vachon 1963; Sissom 1990b, fig. 3.1H); ventral margin of movable finger smooth (i.e., lacking denticles).  Ventral aspect of cheliceral movable finger with distinct serrula.
Pedipalps:  Trichobothrial pattern Type C, orthobothriotaxic (completely illustrated for the holotype female in Sissom 1990a: Fig. 2, A-F).  Femur:  Dorsointernal, ventrointernal, and dorsoexternal carinae strong, granulose; ventroexternal carinae vestigial, with irregular coarse granules along distal part of segment.  Internal face with about 18-20 large granules; dorsal face with scattered coarse granulation.  Femur length/width ratio = 3.47.  Patella:  Dorsointernal and ventrointernal carinae strong, serrate.  Dorsoexternal and ventroexternal carinae moderate, granular.  Internal face with longitudinal row of about 16 granules; external face with scattered coarse granulation; dorsal and ventral faces lacking noticeable granulation.  Patella length/width ratio = 3.30.  Chela (Figs. 3-4) with dorsal marginal carinae weak, granular; dorsointernal carinae weak to moderate, with a few larger, rounded granules; other carinae essentially obsolete.  Dentate margin of fixed finger with primary row divided into six subrows by five larger denticles; six inner accessory denticles; trichobothria ib and it at base of fixed finger.  Dentate margin of movable finger with primary denticle row divided into six subrows by five larger denticles; apical subrow with only one denticle; seven inner accessory denticles.  Terminal denticles of chela fingers somewhat enlarged and bladelike, overlapping considerably when chela closed; fingertips with small white distal caps.  Chela length/width ratio = 4.73; movable finger length/chela width = 3.05; fixed finger length/carapace length = 0.89.
Legs.  Midventral spinule row of telotarsus terminating between two pairs of enlarged spinules.

Measurements of Male (mm):  Total L, 27.35; carapace L, 3.20; mesosoma L, 8.65; metasoma L, 11.95; telson L, 3.55.  Metasomal segments:  I L/W, 1.65/1.80; II L/W, 1.85/1.70; III L/W, 1.95/1.65; IV L/W, 2.70/1.60; V L/W,  3.80/1.60.  Telson:  vesicle L/W/D, 2.25/1.30/1.00; aculeus L, 1.30.  Pedipalps:  femur L/W, 2.95/0.85; patella L/W, 3.30/1.00; chela L/W/D, 5.20/1.10/1.20; fixed finger L, 2.85; movable finger L, 3.35; palm (underhand) L, 2.05.


Sissom and Hendrickson 2005:39,40,41 -  Key to the Vaejovid Scorpion Species of Northeastern México  - Dorsolateral carinae of metasoma (at least on segments I–III) with an enlarged terminal denticle; legs I–III with irregular setation (except in V. globosus, which has setal combs, – but has the enlarged terminal denticle on the metasoma); Trichobothria ib and it situated at base of chela fixed finger; Pectinal tooth counts greater than 14 in males, greater than 11 in females; pedipalp chela with ventral face rounded, with or without ventromedian carina; chela movable finger length/chela palm width ratio greater than 1.8; adults variable in size and color; Cheliceral movable finger with ventral margin smooth; Pedipalp patella with 2 esb trichobothria; Ventral submedian carinae present (usually weak on I–II, stronger on III–IV); metasoma with paired setae (on segments I–IV, usually 3–6 pairs) and no more than one or two setae in the intercarinal spaces; pectinal tooth counts less than 20 in males, less than 18 in females; Body color light yellow brown to brown (if brown, with distinct mottling); adult body length less than 35 mm in both sexes; Pectinal tooth counts 14–18 in females, 17–18 in males; pedipalp chela length/width greater than 4.0; larger scorpions, both adult males and females over 27 mm in length; Coloration light yellow brown, with diffuse or weak dusky markings .Vaejovis chisos*

distribution: NORTH AMERICA. USA (Texas: known only from the Chisos Mountains).

Published Records:  USA: Texas: Brewster Co.: Big Bend National Park, near upper end of Pine Canyon, 27 May 1992 (R. Henson, J. Davidowski, T. Weseman), 3 females, 1 male (ASU); Big Bend National Park, from waterfall in Pine Canyon to edge of wooded area (29°15'44" N: 103°15'15"W to 29°16'01"N: 103°14'44"W), 27 May 1992 (R. Henson, T. Weseman, J. Davidowski), 1 male (ASU); Big Bend National Park, Upper Pine Canyon Trail, 23 May 2003 (R. Henson, P. Carmichael, N. Lopez, A. Anderson), 16 females, 1 male (ASU); 29 May 2003, 1 female, 6 juvs. (ASU); Big Bend National Park, Kibbee Spring Trail (29°16'24"N: 103°17'06"W to 29°16'25"N: 103°17'13"W), 22 May 1992 (R. N. Henson, T. Weseman, J. Davidowski), 1 female (ASU); Big Bend National Park, wooded area of Pine Canyon Trail, 27 May 2002 (R. N. Henson, T. Weseman, J. Davidowski), 9 females, 1  juvenile male (ASU).

notes: Jarvis et al. 2005: The scorpion Vaejovis chisos Sissom, 1990 was described on the basis of an adult female and two juvenile specimens from the Chisos Mountains in Big Bend National Park in Texas, USA.  The species is closely related to V. dugesi Pocock, 1902 and V. sprousei Sissom, 1990, neither of which were previously known from adult males. 
Variation. – In addition to the three adult males examined, 30 new adult females were also available, providing the opportunity to better analyze variation in morphometric and meristic characters in the species.
      Variation in pectinal tooth counts for 3 males and 20 females was as follows:  in males, there were 3 combs with 18 teeth and 3 combs with 19 teeth; in females there were 1 comb with 14 teeth, 11 combs with 15 teeth, 22 combs with 16 teeth, and 5 combs with 17 teeth.  In the three females from the original type series, there were three combs with 16 teeth and three with 17. 
In females, the genital opercula have a membranous anterior connection, but in males they are completely separated.  Female pectinal teeth are shorter and peglike, in contrast to the larger "banana-shaped" teeth of the male.  In addition, each pectinal tooth in the male bears an elongate patch of peg sensilla; these patches are smaller in the female.
Setal counts for the metasoma exhibited little variation.   The modal counts, based on the left metasomal I-IV carinae of 20 specimens, were as follows: dorsolaterals, 0:1:1:1; lateral supramedians, 0:1:1:1; lateral inframedians, 1:0:0:0 ; ventrolaterals, 2:3:3:3; and ventral submedians, 3:3:3:4.  In one of the specimens, an unpaired accessory seta was found in the ventral intercarinal space on segment III.  For segment V, the modal counts for these specimens were:  dorsolaterals, 3; lateromedians, 2; ventrolaterals, 4.  Four of the specimens had small setal pores distally above the ventrolateral carinae (not the larger distal setae on the anal carina where it meets the ventrolateral carina), but these were interpreted as microsetae and not counted.
      Variation was also noted in the number of inner accessory denticles flanking the chela finger denticle rows.  These were counted on 20 specimens, and the counts are reported for both the left and right sides (L/R).  For the chela fixed finger, three specimens exhibited counts of 5/5, five had 5/6 or 6/5, and 12 had 6/6.  In most cases (12/16 fingers), those with five granules were missing the basal granule of the series, but on four fingers, the distal denticle was missing.  For the movable finger, two specimens had counts of 5/6, one had 7/5, 13 had 6/6, three had 6/7 or 7/6, and one had 7/7.  This type of variation in inner accessory denticles is also seen in Vaejovis vorhiesi Stahnke, 1940 and related species from Arizona (Sissom, unpub. data).

      Variation in selected morphometric ratios of the three adult males is as follows (presented as mean + sd [range]):  chela length/width, 4.78 + 0.11 (4.71-4.90);  pedipalp femur length/width, 3.57 + 0.14 (3.47-3.73); pedipalp patella length/width, 3.19 + 0.12 (3.07-3.30); fixed finger length/carapace length, 0.86 + 0.06 (0.79-0.91); metasomal segment III length/width, 1.23 + 0.05 (1.18-1.28); metasomal segment V length/width, 2.33 + 0.05 (2.27-2.38); and carapace length/metasomal segment V length, 0.88 + 0.62 (0.84-0.91).  For 20 females, the ratios were as follows: chela length/width, 4.80 + 0.25 (4.39-5.25);  pedipalp femur length/width, 3.44 + 0.12 (3.17-3.57); pedipalp patella length/width, 3.08 + 0.07 (2.96-3.20); fixed finger length/carapace length, 0.86 + 0.02 (0.81-0.90); metasomal segment III length/width, 1.09 + 0.03 (1.05-1.13); metasomal segment V length/width, 2.21 + 0.05 (2.14-2.32); and carapace length/metasomal segment V length, 0.97 + 0.02 (0.93-1.10).

.– The morphometric ratios used earlier to separate females of V. chisos from V. sprousei (Sissom 1990a) are still largely valid, except that there is very slight overlap between the lower end of the ranges in V. chisos and the upper end of the ranges in V. sprousei.  The differences in the male hemispermatophore (see below) and chela morphometrics (slender in V. chisos and slightly inflated in V. sprousei) provide additional characters to separate the two species.
Within the mexicanus group, the hemispermatophores of V. chisos and V. sprousei are quite similar in structure.  Both have a crest on the distal lamina, a single blunt hook at the base of the blade on the dorsal aspect, and a series of denticles along the invaginated floor of the sperm duct.  However, the hemispermatophore of V. chisos is much more slender than that of V. sprousei (see González Santillán & Sissom, in press).  Further, the denticles along the sperm duct are very distinct in V. sprousei but minute and scarcely discernible in V. chisos.

Specimens were collected in thickly wooded areas with substantial ground cover (i.e., decayed leaves, plant cover), mainly from the banks and slopes associated with trail cuts.  These areas were more moist than adjoining slopes where the species was not found.




The material included in this site is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 0413453.  Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
© Copyright 2005-2006.  All images in this site, even if they do not include an individual statement of copyright, are protected under the U. S. Copyright Act.  They may not be "borrowed" or otherwise used without our express permission or the express permission of the photographer(s),  artist(s), or author(s).  For permission, please submit your request to